We put a micrometer on nine brands of poop bag.
Thickness is the only thing a waste bag does. There is one job and one failure mode, and the distance between them is the gauge of the film, measured in microns. So we bought nine boxes, took three bags out of each, and measured the mid panel away from the seam.
Seven of the nine printed no gauge anywhere.
Not on the box, not in the listing, not on the brand's own website. Two of those seven used the phrase "extra thick" on the front. One used "heavy duty" twice. We are not going to name them here because a single box is not a production run and we are not interested in picking a fight we cannot support with a sample size. We will name them when we have measured ten boxes of each from different lots.
What the numbers looked like
- The thinnest came in at 9 micron, which is roughly a supermarket carrier bag.
- Four of the nine sat between 10 and 12 micron.
- Two were at 15, which is where ours sits.
- One measured 19 micron and was noticeably stiffer in the hand and bulkier on the roll.
- The spread between two boxes both described as "heavy duty" was 7 micron, which is most of the way to double.
What we take from it
Not that thicker is always better. 19 micron is genuinely more bag than most dogs require, and you carry that difference on every walk. The point is narrower than that: a category where nearly nobody publishes the one number that matters is a category where the word on the front of the box has stopped meaning anything.
So we print ours. 15 micron, on the front, next to the count. If you have a very large dog and want more, buy a 20 micron bag from somebody else and we will not try to talk you out of it.
What we have not done
We have not load tested any of them. A gauge figure and a drop test are different claims and we are not going to let one stand in for the other. The load test is next, with a published method, and we will put our own bag through it on the same film and the same day as everybody else's.